SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 May 2006 16:47:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Hi Wayne,
We're still working the bug's out of the bugfix, bugfix-4.., and fastbug 
repositories.  We haven't gotten scripts ironed out yet.
There was also problem that Connie and Myself were thinking two 
different ways about the bugfix area, but we thought that the other was 
thinking the same way as ourselves.  (Does that make sense.)

In S.L. 4.2 we just had the 'bugfix' area, but that ended up being too 
generic of a term.  So now in S.L. 4.3 we have two area's.  This is from 
the release notes.

----------------
fastbug/RPMS/
	Packages rebuilt from the Upstream Vendor Fastrack rpms
	These are rpms that are expected to be in the next Update
	They have gone through full QA by the Upstream Vendor
bugfix44/RPMS/
	Reserved for packages from the next Update in case we do not
         do a full release.
	Commonly this is empty as we really did the update.
-----------------

Back to S.L. 4.2, the current bugfix area is pointing to bugfix43, which 
  as you pointed out, looks like we didn't get the latest stuff that 
actually came out with S.L. 4.3.  I'll work on getting that fixed up, 
that will hopefully be done tomorrow.

Troy

Wayne Betts wrote:
> There was a bugfix released about two months ago by the upstream vendor 
> (RHBA-2006:0011) for EL 4 (part of the updates from U2 to U3 I think) 
> for a very annoying bug in openoffice:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170391 in which the 
> spellchecker is unable to replace words.
> 
> The updated packages are in the SL4.3 distro, so I can get them, but I 
> was hoping/expecting to see them in the SL 4.2 bugfix repo.
> 
> Is the fact that it was part of U3 the reason why it is not offered in 
> the bugfix repo for 42 (which is empty)?
> 
> 
> Also, there seems to be an oddity in the 4.3 distro with the 
> openoffice.org packages...
> Consider the following packages:
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/43/i386/SL/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-31.6.0.EL4.i386.rpm 
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/43/i386/errata/bugfix/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-28.6.0.EL4.i386.rpm 
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/43/i386/errata/bugfix-43/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-28.6.0.EL4.i386.rpm 
> 
> 
> The verion in bugfix appears to be lower than the original version.
> Finally, what is the difference, if any, between bugfix and bugfix-43?
> 
> I guess I'm pretty well confused about the bugfix repos at the moment,
> 
> - Wayne


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2