SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

May 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 May 2006 16:04:22 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (45 lines)
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Connie Sieh wrote:

> I have included the "Upstream Vendor" release notes for Update 6 and
> Update 7.

I just noticed a minor thing with the 3.0.7 release (which my scripts 
didn't pick up before because I'd not turned up the verbosity level high 
enough)...

3.0.5 contains nedit-5.4-1 but in 3.0.7 this seems to have reverted to 
5.3-4.1 (as the vendor shipped), though 30x/SRPMS/ contains the newer
nedit-5.4-1.src.rpm package (well obviously)...

From the release-notes:

> NEDIT
>
>        Nedit was found to have a bug preventing it from opening files.
>        Rebuilding from source did not clear up the problem.  It also
>        showed a comment that STRONGLY suggested just getting the binaries
>        from nedit.org.  We followed this advice, and we packaged the
>        binaries from nedit.org, into an rpm
>
>        nedit-5.4-1.i386.rpm

but later it says:

> *As of Update 7
...
> *       nedit-5.3-4.1.i386.rpm
...

So I'm *assuming* that this is an accident rather than a deliberate 
reversion.

Apologies for not spotting this before.  This is the only package (that we 
install) that shows a lower revision for 3.0.7 than in 3.0.5

If it is intentional the comment about using nedit-5.4-1 should probably 
be corrected.

-- 
Jon Peatfield,  Computer Officer,  DAMTP,  University of Cambridge
Mail:  [log in to unmask]     Web:  http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2