SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:32:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Hi Stephan,
I know it's on the main mirror, I've checked several times, even today. 
  Judging from your output you aren't pointing at the main mirror (it 
usually says sl-errata and sl-base)
But you seem to have the same configuration ... so if you could point to 
a repository that has the errata, you might be able to help track it down.

Troy

Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> Hi Troy,
> 
> here's my case (it's SL 4.2):
> 
> [x] /root # rpm -qa \*mozilla\*
> mozilla-nss-1.7.12-1.4.2.i386
> mozilla-1.7.12-1.4.2.i386
> mozilla-nss-1.7.12-1.4.2.x86_64
> mozilla-nspr-1.7.12-1.4.2.x86_64
> mozilla-nspr-1.7.12-1.4.2.i386
> [x] /root # yum update mozilla
> Setting up Update Process
> Setting up repositories
> 42errata                  100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00     
> 42server                  100% |=========================| 1.1 kB    00:00     
> Reading repository metadata in from local files
> Could not find update match for mozilla
> No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
> [x] /root # 
> 
> Almost all of the i386 mozilla packages (including plain mozilla itself)
> for this last update are simply missing in the x86_64 errata repository.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Stephan
> 
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
> 
>>That's strange, because yes, this was something I checked, and on both SL42
>>and SL41.  But as I look, I had the x86_64 versions installed.
>>Can you send the output of
>>
>>  rpm -qa | grep mozilla
>>
>>and if there isn't any arch's on the end of the rpm's send a
>>
>>  yum list mozilla\*
>>
>>That way we can setup a test problem and hopefully be able to fix it easier.
>>
>>Troy
>>
>>Alan J. Flavell wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Overnight Yum errata:-
>>>>Error: Missing Dependency: mozilla-nspr = 37:1.7.12-1.4.2 is needed by
>>>>Error: package mozilla
>>>>Error: Missing Dependency: mozilla-nss = 37:1.7.12-1.4.2 is needed by
>>>>Error: package mozilla
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm not sure whether this is helpful, but I can report that I just
>>>updated a SL4.2 i386-architecture system successfully. (with yum).
>>>
>>>It wanted to update firefox (1 package) and mozilla (6 packages,
>>>including the two mentioned above), and the update completed normally.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Note: Although it's the x86_64 distro I have the i386 mozilla packages.
>>>
>>>
>>>So it's 4.1 versus 4.2, and x86_64 versus i386.
>>>
>>>Hope this is vaguely useful, anyhow.
>>
>>
>>
> 


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2