SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bly, MJ (Martin)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bly, MJ (Martin)
Date:
Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:59:56 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Hi Bill,

Rpm is a shared-libs-linked binary using glibc and various other bits
and pieces including glibc.  My guess is that you'd need to make all the
extras for i386 too.  Rpm trips over one non-existant instruction that
other programs don't use.

Martin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
> Behalf Of Bill Feero
> Sent: 07 February 2006 15:00
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: SL 4.2 rpm-4.3.3 causes an illegal instruction error
> 
> I'm trying to run SL 4.2 on a x486 machine. I've recompiled 
> the kernel and I get the system to boot.
> However, when I try to run rpm, I get al illegal instruction error.
> 
> When rpm was built, was it compiled as a i386 or as something 
> else? The rpm is a i386.rpm.
> 
> My hardware platform is a 486 (actually an AMD Elan SC520) 
> and I can't change it. And I need
> the 'latest' kernel and Linux features.
> 
> Does anyone know of any software that can analyze a program 
> and determine the instruction set? (386/486/686 etc)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bill Feero
> Logical Solutions, Inc.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2