SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:08:29 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Hi Tony,

> I was under the impression that most issues with XFS and stacks came 
> up when stacking it up with MD and LVM.  There is a patch to 

Yes that's right, thanks for jogging my memory.

> serialize call chains such as XFS->LVM->MD, but I don't know if 
> Redhat as added it to their distributed kernel.
> 
> SGI does have a test source rpm in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL4/
> for 2.6.9-22.EL.  This does also build properly against 2.6.9-
> 22.0.1.EL.  It looks like it put together sometime in Nov2005 so 
> should be pretty representitive of the current state of XFS development.

In my case, I was building production clusters so couldn't rely on patches
here and there but needed something supported by the vendor (ext3).

Regards,

Michael.

> Tony Hoffmann | Tel/Tél: (250) 493-2277 | Fax: (250) 493-7767
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> National Research Council Canada | P.O. Box 248, Penticton BC V2A 6J9
> Conseil national de recherches Canada | B.P. 248, Penticton (C.-B.)
>  V2A 6J9 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
> Michael Mansour
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: Bonnie Alcorn; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: XFS and SL4.2
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > We are currently using SL3.05 with XFS and are considering going to 
> > SL 
> > 4.2  We use XFS for our data areas.  Does anyone have any experience 
> > using XFS with 4.2?  Are there any known problems?  I would be happy 
> > to hear about any experiences, good or bad.
> 
> I used XFS on 4.2 for a couple of months in test, but found an issue 
> with the 4k and 8k buffers? (I think that's what they were called) 
> when using them. My severs would hard crash when putting any 
> legitimate load on them.
> 
> >From memory (you can check the list archives for my emails related to this),
> it turned out that RH compiled only 4k into the kernel, and XFS 
> needed 8k.
> 
> I begrungingly removed XFS from the data volume and reformatted to ext3.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael.
------- End of Original Message -------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2