Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:08:29 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tony,
> I was under the impression that most issues with XFS and stacks came
> up when stacking it up with MD and LVM. There is a patch to
Yes that's right, thanks for jogging my memory.
> serialize call chains such as XFS->LVM->MD, but I don't know if
> Redhat as added it to their distributed kernel.
>
> SGI does have a test source rpm in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL4/
> for 2.6.9-22.EL. This does also build properly against 2.6.9-
> 22.0.1.EL. It looks like it put together sometime in Nov2005 so
> should be pretty representitive of the current state of XFS development.
In my case, I was building production clusters so couldn't rely on patches
here and there but needed something supported by the vendor (ext3).
Regards,
Michael.
> Tony Hoffmann | Tel/Tél: (250) 493-2277 | Fax: (250) 493-7767
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> National Research Council Canada | P.O. Box 248, Penticton BC V2A 6J9
> Conseil national de recherches Canada | B.P. 248, Penticton (C.-B.)
> V2A 6J9 Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
> Michael Mansour
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: Bonnie Alcorn; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: XFS and SL4.2
>
> Hi,
>
> > We are currently using SL3.05 with XFS and are considering going to
> > SL
> > 4.2 We use XFS for our data areas. Does anyone have any experience
> > using XFS with 4.2? Are there any known problems? I would be happy
> > to hear about any experiences, good or bad.
>
> I used XFS on 4.2 for a couple of months in test, but found an issue
> with the 4k and 8k buffers? (I think that's what they were called)
> when using them. My severs would hard crash when putting any
> legitimate load on them.
>
> >From memory (you can check the list archives for my emails related to this),
> it turned out that RH compiled only 4k into the kernel, and XFS
> needed 8k.
>
> I begrungingly removed XFS from the data volume and reformatted to ext3.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
------- End of Original Message -------
|
|
|