SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Hannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Hannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:37:43 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
>> Hi, folks.  We'd like to use iptables on a SL 3.x box to redirect 
>> incoming email messages to a central spam/virus-filter system, where 
>> it would be scanned and, possibly, sent back to the SL box.
>>
>> I.e., iptables has to accept mail from the spam/virus-filter box,
>>  but re-vector all other email TO the spam/virus-filter box.
>>
>> It looks as if the DNAT option is what we want, but we haven't been 
>> able to make this work.
>>
>> If you have this working, would you please contact me directly?  Thanks.
> 
> Wouldn't it be easier to MX inbound mail to the central spam/virus-filter
> system and then deliver "clean" mail to the relevant servers? (which can be
> the SL box).

Hi, Michael.  It's certainly a good idea to use MX records as you 
describe, and we do that already.  Unfortunately, we have empirical 
evidence that many spammers don't bother to use the MX records.

We could also just reject email that doesn't arrive via our spam/virus 
filter, but it's hard to be sure that there isn't some legitimate source 
of email that's using the 'A' record.  Email is a VERY touchy subject.

Thanks.

					- Mike
-- 
Michael Hannon            mailto:[log in to unmask]
Dept. of Physics          530.752.4966
University of California  530.752.4717 FAX
Davis, CA 95616-8677

ATOM RSS1 RSS2