SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fabien Wernli <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:09:45 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:16:03PM -0600, Robert Boehm wrote:
> Hi Ioannis:
> 
> Yes....the disk is completely healthy....Troy and I were wrong
> about that...so we are back to the mystery, however I remember

In my experience, smart isn't quite reliable as it should be:
I have so many examples where smart says it's ok, but it isn't, or where
smart says it's dying but the disk works perfectly.

Thus the only safe way to work it out is:

1) if smart says the disk is unhealthy, change it
2) if you get I/O errors in syslog, change it
   even if smart says it's all ok

ATOM RSS1 RSS2