SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ioannis Vranos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ioannis Vranos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:47:09 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Robert Boehm wrote:
> No...those lines tell about WHICH TYPE of failure it's looking for...some
> are just old age type failures...and others...and these are important...are
> PRE-FAILURE modes...in otherwords...if you had unreadable sectors
> and stuff like that...like I have.  What's nice about Scientific Linux is
> that the smart.config file is written to e-mail you on the system mail
> if it finds one of these errors...
> 
> On your tests, the key is that there were no errors...period.  THAT is
> a very significant thing, especially with the "long" test...which is
> very thorough....some of the actual data lines are hard to interpret,
> so you have to look them up..but all of your lines look WELL within
> normal values....what's happening on the boot process and getting logged
> is something different...I just don't know what it is..


OK, thank you very much Robert for the thorough information!

And thanks to all for the great insight on SL matters!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2