Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:26:25 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> Robert Boehm wrote:
>
>>>[snip].....That's what I do on few systems: no real problems seen so far.
>>>[which brings me to the very nice feature of apt that yum
>>>(IMHO) is missing: one can specify repository precedence ..
>>>I'm not sure if smartpm implements that concept too]
>>>
>>>Jarek
>>
>>
>>Thanks, Jarek....this is VERY helpful...as I have been AWAY from the
>>Red Hat/Fedora set-up for a while....I will evaluate and figure out what
>>I want! VERY helpful indeed...
>
>
> Hold on: There are some serious apt disadvantages:
>
> - apt (for RPM, I'm not talking about Debian apt here)
> is not developped anymore since Mandrake took over
> Connectiva Linux ...
>
> - apt is missing bi-arch capabilities (so cannot really
> be used on RH/FC for 64bit archs - x86_64/ia64 - unless
> ALL 32bit compatibility packages are removed ...
>
> Cheers
>
> Jarek
On the yum end, with the 2.4 yum it has plugin capability.
One of the yum plugin's that we have is yum-protectbase
I don't think this is totally like apt's repostiroy precedence, but what
it does is you can say 'This repository trumps all others'
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|