SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: witch rpm files
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:55:18 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines) 
Igor Kresnik wrote:
> Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
>> Igor Kresnik wrote:
>>
>>> Helo
>>> My name its Igor. Which rpm files are suitable for upgrade OO in SL 4.2
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Igor
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Igor,
>> What do you mean by 'upgrade 00'?
>>
> i mean Open Office. i like have an my SL 4.2 Open Office 2.0.1
> 
> Igor

The openoffice rpm's from openoffice.org do not conflict with the 
openoffice rpm's in our distribution.
So you can either keep, or remove,  the openoffice 1.1 rpm's.  I've got 
machines in both configurations.
In either case, after installing all the regular openoffice rpm's, don't 
forget to look in the directory 'RPMS/desktop-integration' and install 
the openoffice.org-redhat-menus rpm.
This put's openoffice 2.0.1 in your menu.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2