SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"John A. Goebel" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John A. Goebel
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:40:02 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (100 lines)
++ 14/12/05 20:19 +0100 - <Stephan Wiesand>:

Hey Stephen,

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, John A. Goebel wrote:
> 
> >++ 14/12/05 18:23 +0000 - <John Rowe>:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >>>What do you want to do with this filesystem?
> >>
> >>Aways a good question. I have a bunch of nonidentical  PCs running SL4.x
> >>connected by gigabit. People can log into any of them and see their home
> >>space. Currently I do this by having two of them as file servers, each
> >>with a mirrored disk pair. Ideally I would like to have a single virtual
> >>"/home" filesystem which I could add physical disks to and which is
> >>resilient to any one node being down.
> >
> >I don't know what your load is like, but can't NFS do this for you and LVM?
> >
> >For the requirement of serving $HOME, NFS is a classic. Although I haven't
> >tried it, NFS 4 has failover. Maybe someone else has a better suggestion?
> 
> Even if that's implemented now (is it?), wouldn't you still need some 
> (cluster) filesystem shared between the servers?

Yes, that's right. Years ago, when I had to do this, I used Kimberlite. Sorry,
I don't know the current resources.

I like the simple solution if it works, so here a recipe:

http://www.linux-ha.org/HaNFS

> AFS won't do the job either (no read-write replication). It would be 
> possible to recover from a failed node quickly and transparent to the 
> client, though.
> 
> The most promising solution in such a scenario to me seems to be something 
> like that described in
> 
>   http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/hepix/talks/041020am/miers.pdf
> 
> Not trivial to set up, and I wonder how lock recovery would work, but the 
> best low cost solution I know of.
 
Also, you might want to poke around Linux HA site. The LAN mirror section
especially:

http://www.linux-ha.org/RelatedTechnologies_2fLanMirroring



John

> Stephan
> 
> >For the requirement of disk management, LVM should do the trick. There are 
> >a
> >bunch of papers online about using LVM/Raid.  You can load and configure 
> >using
> >kickstart. I have a ks.cfg that I can send to you if you interested, but
> >basically I used a version from the net and modified it for my use.
> >
> >Sounds like you don't need too fancy a configuration.
> >
> >>Needless to say, there's no budget for any fancy hardware.
> >
> >I know that feeling.
> >
> >John
> >
> >>John
> >
> >##############################################
> ># John Goebel <jgoebel(at)slac.stanford.edu> #
> ># Stanford Linear Accelerator Center         #
> ># 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025  #
> >############################################ #
> >
> 
> -- 
> 
>  ----------------------------------------------------
> | Stephan Wiesand  |                                |
> |                  |                                |
> | DESY     - DV -  | phone  +49 33762 7 7370        |
> | Platanenallee 6  | fax    +49 33762 7 7216        |
> | 15738 Zeuthen    |                                |
> | Germany          |                                |
>  ----------------------------------------------------

##############################################
# John Goebel <jgoebel(at)slac.stanford.edu> #
# Stanford Linear Accelerator Center         #
# 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025  #
############################################ #

ATOM RSS1 RSS2