SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:04:36 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> Hi.
> 
>   I am will install SL-4.2 in a cluster linux and I am in doubt about the
> partitions and filesystems schema used by the comunit. We have 4x146GB disks,
> the ideia is to have on with the /home (ext3 with quota) of the users ant the
> other three make a huge scratch area. The question is, for this scratch which
> is the best filesystem? Simply ext3 or is better to use reiserfs or openAFS?
> 
>   Thanks

If this is a scratch area, I would make it ext3.
Why?
I believe ext3 is the best 'all around' file system.  And if you have a 
scratch area, that is what you are going to get.  A wide variety of files.

The other two that would be an option (though neither is 'officially' 
supported in scientific linux) would be reiser or xfs.
OpenAFS, and GFS, both are not options.  They are both distributed file 
systems, and definatly not the right tool for the job.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2