SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ioannis Vranos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ioannis Vranos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:34:54 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Robert Haines wrote:
>> Seems more like jealousy or `not invented here' attitude than any good
>> logical reasons to me.  XFS was developed by SGI.  Redhat seems to see 
>> SGI as
>> a competitor, so do not help your competition no matter how stupid the
>> decision is or how much extra work it costs you.  Just one of many stupid
>> decisions by Redhat.
> 
> 
> Up until recently SGI used RedHat as the OS on their Altix and Prism 
> ranges of machines but they have since moved over to SuSE. There may be 
> a bit of tension there and RedHat may have spit out their dummy!


I have found these today as I was checking about various file systems. Although a bit old, 
may be informing.


http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3

http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/why.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2