SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: rsync problems...
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:10:56 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines) 
Jon,

On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Jon Peatfield wrote:

> Did I miss an announcement of some change or is the rsync server just 
> permanently overloaded now?

Not that we know of.

> 
> $ rsync -l rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/
> @ERROR: max connections (4) reached - try again later
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (66 bytes read so far)
> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)

> 
> I've got errors suggesting that attempts were failing overnight too.
> 
> Is 4 a sensible limit for the number of connections?
> 
> 

Will check.

-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2