SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Paul A. Rombouts" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paul A. Rombouts
Date:
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:09:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi,

I have noticed that there is a kernel-2.6.9-22.0.1.EL.i686.rpm update in 
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/41/i386/errata/SL/RPMS/ 
but no kernel-2.6.9-22.0.1.EL.src.rpm in 
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/41/SRPMS/vendor/errata/.

On my machine a kernel compiled specifically for the AMD Athlon seems to 
work much better than the generic i686 RHEL kernel.

In the mean time I have downloaded a 22.0.1.EL src rpm from 
ftp.redhat.com and compiled that. As far as I can tell there is no 
difference in content between the kernel source packages from 
ftp.redhat.com and ftp.scientificlinux.org, only the signature is different.

Can anyone tell me if there are any other subtle differences between the 
kernel source packages from ftp.redhat.com and ftp.scientificlinux.org?

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Rombouts

ATOM RSS1 RSS2