SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

September 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:33:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Howdy,
I want a second or third opinion on this.
Currently, there are 3 different openafs versions on the S.L. 3.0.x 
versions.
SL 301 - openafs-1.2.10
SL 302,3,4 - openafs-1.2.11
SL 305 - openafs-1.2.13

I believe I said before, that with the next security kernel update, I'd 
like to move them all up to the same version.  If I didn't, I meant to.

Does this sound like a good idea?  (I still think it does)

If it does, I was planning on doing openafs-1.2.13-15.17.SL
This is the same openafs as was released in S.L. 3.0.5, but has the init 
script fixed to work properly with LSB.

Any thoughts?

Troy

-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2