SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Thomas E. Haynes" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:48:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
Greetings...

RHEL dropped the support for the PERC card in the Dell 6300 when they moved
to 4.0. This seems an odd decision to me.

I have kept two of our servers at SL 3 for this reason. The other two are
happily running SL 4.

Regards...   Tom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Hannon
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Dell PERC RAID controller not recognized under SL 4.0 or 4.1
> 
> Greetings.  We're running RHEL AS on a Dell PowerEdge 2400:
> 
>      # cat /etc/redhat-release
>      Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 5)
> 
> The disk drives are SCSI disk drives, all of which are attached to a
> PERC RAID controller.  This particular RAID controller appears to be an:
> 
>      American Megatrends (AMI) PERC2/DC
> 
> There are four logical volumes (two mirrors, two RAID 5), presented to
> the OS as sda, sdb, sdc, and sdd.
> 
> The system BIOS and PERC BIOS are both at the latest stable levels (A08
> and 1.06, resp.).
> 
> We'd like to be able to run SL on all of our linux boxes.  As a step in
> that direction, we tried to install SL 4.1 on this PowerEdge.  Anaconda
> reports that it cannot find any hard drives on this system.  The SL 4.0
> installer reports the same thing.
> 
> As an experiment, we tried running the SL 3.0.5 installer.  That
> installer kvetches about the partition alignment, but it allows as how
> we can probably ignore the problem, and Disk Druid does indeed show all
> the existing partitions.  As we didn't really want SL 3.0.5 installed,
> we didn't take this any further.
> 
> It really would be best if we could get SL 4.1 installed.  If you have
> any suggestions about this, please send them to me.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 					- Mike
> --
> Michael Hannon            mailto:[log in to unmask]
> Dept. of Physics          530.752.4966
> University of California  530.752.4717 FAX
> Davis, CA 95616-8677
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/84 - Release Date: 8/29/2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2