SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:06:07 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: RHEL kernel on SL 4.1
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Daniel Pfenniger <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (30 lines) 
Daniel,

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Daniel Pfenniger wrote:

> Connie Sieh wrote:
> 
> >Daniel,
> >
> >..
> >  
> >
> >If these binary modules were built against the RedHat binary kernel(with 
> >the same version) then they should work with the SL kernel too(versions 
> >have to match).
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> Yes, but the vendor distributes only the binary modules for about 50 
> kernels...

Yes but if the RHEL kernel is that same exact name as the SL kernel then 
the binary module should not know the difference.

> 
> 
> 

-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2