SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marcelo Medeiros Guimaraes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marcelo Medeiros Guimaraes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:02:03 -0300
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (46 lines)
Hi,

I can mount manually some directories but others not.
I'll still try to use a new version of mount.

I installed the Suse 9.3 in other machine and it uses the mount version 
2.12q. It's working fine, it mounted all the disks in all the machines.

I'll try the new version of mount tomorrow.

Cheers
Marcelo

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Connie Sieh wrote:

> Note that the default NFS mount on SL 4.0 is tcp vs udp.
> 
> Can you manually mount the directories in question?
> 
> -connie
> On Tue, 31 May 
> 2005, Marcelo Medeiros Guimaraes wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We were trying to use the Scientific Linux 4.0 in our laboratory but we 
> > stoped because it was not able to mount all the exported directories 
> > listed in the automount files. 
> > It finds the NIS and some directories exported by some machines, 
> > but it simply do not find the rest.
> > 
> > I don't think it is a problem caused by version of the operational systems 
> > or the version of the "mount" package.
> > The machine mounts the directories in other machine running redhat7.2 and 
> > in a Sun machine, without problem.
> > But it was not able to mount directories in machines running Suse9.0.
> > 
> > Does anyone have problems with the NFS in this version of the SC linux?
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Marcelo Guimaraes
> > 
> > Astrophysics Laboratory - UFMG - BRAZIL 
> > 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2