Hi Michael,
Since you pay RedHat why not ask them?
regards,
Stephen.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Greetings. We're running a mixture of Redhat Enterprise Linux, version
> 3 (RHEL 3) and Scientific Linux version 3 (SL 3). We happen to be
> running RHEL on our AMD (Opteron) workstations, simply because SL either
> wasn't available for them or wasn't on our radar when we got the
> workstations.
>
> Redhat has recently announced a patch (or patch set?) for openoffice.
> We've tried on two different Opteron, x86_64 systems to install the
> patch. It fails on both of them in weird ways, as, for instance:
>
> # /usr/sbin/up2date --update --nox
> Invalid group id server-cfg
>
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-ws-3...
>
> Fetching rpm headers...
> ########################################
>
> Name Version Rel
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> openoffice.org 1.1.2 24.2.0.EL3
> i386
> openoffice.org-i18n 1.1.2 24.2.0.EL3
> i386
> openoffice.org-libs 1.1.2 24.2.0.EL3
> i386
>
>
> Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
> There was a package dependency problem. The message was:
>
> Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
> openoffice.org-libs 1.1.2-24.2.0.EL3 requires libbonobo-activation.so.4
> openoffice.org-libs 1.1.2-24.2.0.EL3 requires libgnomevfs-2.so.0
>
> We tried just removing all of the openoffice* stuff and reinstalling.
> The results are at least equally strange:
>
> ]# up2date openoffice
> Invalid group id server-cfg
>
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-ws-3...
>
> Fetching rpm headers...
> ########################################
>
> Name Version Rel
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> openoffice 1.0.2 8
> i386
>
>
> Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
> ########################################
> openoffice-1.0.2-8.i386.rpm ########################## Done.
> There was a package dependency problem. The message was:
> Dependencies should have already been resolved, but they are not.
>
> On the other hand, if we do a "yum update" on our SL 3.0.3, i386
> systems, the new openoffice stuff installs perfectly.
>
> I'd appreciate hearing comments, suggestions, etc., about this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Mike
>
--
/------------------------------------+-------------------------\
|Stephen J. Gowdy | SLAC, MailStop 34, |
|http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~gowdy/ | 2575 Sand Hill Road, |
|http://calendar.yahoo.com/gowdy | Menlo Park CA 94025, USA |
|EMail: [log in to unmask] | Tel: +1 650 926 3144 |
\------------------------------------+-------------------------/
|