SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

April 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bly, MJ (Martin)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bly, MJ (Martin)
Date:
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:20:50 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Hi Connie,

Can confirm it now works.

Thanks,  Martin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Connie Sieh [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: 19 April 2005 16:26
> To: Bly, MJ (Martin)
> Cc: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: Scientific Linux 4.0 for i386 Release Candidate 
> 2.5 is now available for testing
> 
> 
> Martin,
> 
> I rebuilt all the images.  They are available at
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/40/
> 
> Thanks for informing us of this issue
> 
> -Connie Sieh
> 
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Bly, MJ (Martin) wrote:
> 
> > I'm trying a PXE/kickstart off our mirror of SL4/RC2.5: the stage2
> > installer craps out with the unispiring warning that 
> > 
> > 	"The Scientific Linux installation 
> > 	tree in that directory does not seem 
> > 	to match your boot media".
> > 
> > I've seen this before when I accidentally mixed up some 
> install media.
> > 
> > Our PXE/Kickstart system has the latest 40rolling and I've 
> copied the
> > images/SL/pxeboot/vmlinuz and initrd.img into the PXE system.
> > 
> > Am I missing something or is there a fault in RC2.5?
> > 
> > Martin.   
> > 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2