SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:30:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
Connie Sieh wrote:

>Bill,
>
>On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Bill Feero wrote:
>
>
>
>>I want to verify my understanding about RPM architecture labeling.
>>
>>I know that i386 is the generic x86 RPM for x86, Pentium, etc.
>>ia64 is for 64-bit processors.
>>
>>what is x86_64 targets?
>>
>>
>
>AMD  Opteron
>AMD  Athlon64
>Intel ia32e
>
>-Connie Sieh
>
>
These are all processors that will do both the 32 bit x86 programs, as
well as 64 bit programs.

You CAN install the i386 distribution on all of these processors, and
everything run's fine and fast.  But if you want to do 64 bit stuff on
those processors, then you need the x86_64 programs that have been
compiled in 64 bit mode.

Now technically the Itanium will do 32 bit programs, but the last tests
I saw were so slow that I really didn't want to go there.  It looks like
many people feel the same, so it has been relegated to just 64 bit
programs for the Itanium.

Troy

>>I have no 64-bit processors, so I have been skipping the ia64 updates, but the x86_64 made me stop and wonder.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>--
>>Bill Feero
>>Logical Solutions, Inc.
>>
>>
>>


--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2