SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:27:56 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Hello,
We've had some problems with the installer and the Nocona (ie. the Xeon
processor with the 64 bit extensions and 5 different names) because the kernel
for it is the ia32e kernel (kernel-2.4.21-20.EL.ia32e.rpm) but the installer
also installs a kernel-smp kernel, wich is a x86_64 kernel.  And by default,
it wants to boot the smp kernel.

There is no ia32e smp kernel, because by default, all of RedHat's ia32e
kernels are smp ... so they figured they didn't have to make a regular and a
smp kernel, just the one.  But that has caused alot of headache.

Anyway ... try just booting into the non-smp kernel, and see if your machine
runs.  If it does, you probrubly should remove the smp kernel, cuz that will
just continue to mess things up.

Troy

Perret Yannick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we've got some new machines, which are Intel Xeon "Nocona".
>
> These processors are supposed to be similar to the Opteron ones,
> with the support for 64 and 32 bits instructions.
> By the way, the /proc/cpuinfo for these machines (installed with
> SL in 3.02) gives
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm lm
> The last one is for "long mode" with is supposed to be be the
> 32+64 bits mode.
>
> I manage to install both a SL 3.02 and a SL 3.03 in 32 bits for
> these machines, but the 64 bits install failed.
> I use the x86_64 scheme for that, all all is fine (PXE boot
> on the x86_64 boot kernel, anaconda installation...) until the
> machine reboots.
> At this point the kernel starts to load and crashes after a
> 'kernel panic'. The only message I can see is a dump of the
> execution stack...
>
> Does someone met the same problem ? Is it the good arch
> to use (x86_64) ?
> It is not really important as they are used in 32 bits at this
> time, but I don't like that :o)
>
> Thank.
>
> --
> Yannick Perret


--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2