SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

November 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:52:34 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (35 lines)
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jaroslaw Polok wrote:

...

>> And yum refuses to install kernel-unsupported.ia32e on my shiny
>> new EM64T test system because it insists that x86_64 is the one and only
>> architecture I should install for.
>
> (isn't it because your yum.conf contains exactarch=1 ?)

Finally got around to checking this: No, yum does this whether or not
exactarch=1 is in effect. This change to /usr/share/yum/archwork.py
seems to fix it:

-    archdict['x86_64']=['noarch','x86_64','athlon','i386','i686']
+    archdict['x86_64']=['noarch','x86_64','ia32e','athlon','i386','i686']

A "yum install kernel-unsupported" will now do the right thing on
an EM64T system, while on an Opteron it still prefers the x86_64 package.
I have no clue why it works this well though...

Cheers,
        Stephan

--

  ----------------------------------------------------
| Stephan Wiesand  |                                |
|                  |                                |
| DESY     - DV -  | phone  +49 33762 7 7370        |
| Platanenallee 6  | fax    +49 33762 7 7216        |
| 15738 Zeuthen    |                                |
| Germany          |                                |
  ----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2