Ken,

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Ken Teh wrote:

> Hi Alan,
>
> I know this problem.  I fix it manually all the time.  This is what you
> do:

So why do you have to do this?  What broke it?

-Connie Sieh
>
> If you do
>
> rpm -qf /usr/include/asm
> rpm -qf /usr/include/linux
>
> you will see that they belong to the rpm glibc-kernheaders.  I always do
> the following:
>
> cd /usr/include
> mv asm asm.glibc-kernheaders
> ln -sf /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/asm asm
> mv linux linux.gblic-kernheaders
> ln -sf /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/linux linux
>
> Then,
>
> cd /usr/src/linux-2.4/include
> ln -sf asm-i386 asm
>
> These last 2 steps are necessary if the asm link is not there.
> /usr/src/linux-2.4 is itself a link.  Be sure it is pointing to the correct
> kernel tree.
>
> There are actually a few more /usr/include directories that correspond to
> subdirectories in /usr/src/linux-2.4/include.  If you need to use the kernel
> tree's headers instead of /usr/include, then you need to mv and ln them as
> well.  I would be very careful with the net/ subdirectory.  I suspect the
> one in /usr/include is used in applications development, so it should not be
> mv'ed.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Ken
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, csieh wrote:
> >
> > > What do you mean by kernel development rpms.
> >
> > I mean that when I did the original 301 install, I went to the custom
> > selection and I checked the box for the kernel development group.
> > This was chiefly so that I could build kernel-modules (I wasn't really
> > planning on building custom kernels, but you never know...)
> >
> > > I assume you mean kernel-source .  Did you have kernel-source
> > > installed before and do you have it installed now.
> >
> > That's right.  (I've responded to Troy now, and I'll report on
> > anything useful that comes up).
> >
> > many thanks.
> >
>