SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:30:12 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (59 lines)
Hi Alan,

I know this problem.  I fix it manually all the time.  This is what you
do:

If you do

rpm -qf /usr/include/asm
rpm -qf /usr/include/linux

you will see that they belong to the rpm glibc-kernheaders.  I always do
the following:

cd /usr/include
mv asm asm.glibc-kernheaders
ln -sf /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/asm asm
mv linux linux.gblic-kernheaders
ln -sf /usr/src/linux-2.4/include/linux linux

Then,

cd /usr/src/linux-2.4/include
ln -sf asm-i386 asm

These last 2 steps are necessary if the asm link is not there.
/usr/src/linux-2.4 is itself a link.  Be sure it is pointing to the correct
kernel tree.

There are actually a few more /usr/include directories that correspond to
subdirectories in /usr/src/linux-2.4/include.  If you need to use the kernel
tree's headers instead of /usr/include, then you need to mv and ln them as
well.  I would be very careful with the net/ subdirectory.  I suspect the
one in /usr/include is used in applications development, so it should not be
mv'ed.

Cheers!

Ken

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Alan J. Flavell wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, csieh wrote:
>
> > What do you mean by kernel development rpms.
>
> I mean that when I did the original 301 install, I went to the custom
> selection and I checked the box for the kernel development group.
> This was chiefly so that I could build kernel-modules (I wasn't really
> planning on building custom kernels, but you never know...)
>
> > I assume you mean kernel-source .  Did you have kernel-source
> > installed before and do you have it installed now.
>
> That's right.  (I've responded to Troy now, and I'll report on
> anything useful that comes up).
>
> many thanks.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2