SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

September 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: First test release for Scientific Linux 3.0.3 (30rolling)
From:
John Franks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Franks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:42:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Hi Connie,

I tried this with good success, but I noticed that the following
packages are apparently not signed.

[root@gauss RPMS]# rpm --checksig *rpm | grep -v gpg
anaconda-9.1.3-3.1.SL.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
anaconda-runtime-9.1.3-3.1.SL.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
GFS-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
GFS-devel-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
GFS-modules-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
GFS-modules-hugemem-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
GFS-modules-smp-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
rpmdb-SL-303-0.20040922.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK

I normally use gpgcheck=1 in my yum.conf so yum balked.

John

On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 23:40, csieh wrote:
> Scientific Linux (SL) Release  30rolling        September 8, 2004
>
> Please send bug reports to the bug tracker that is at
>
>         http://www.scientificlinux.org
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2