SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: perl
From:
Tru Huynh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tru Huynh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:46:59 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 04:21:32PM -0500, csieh wrote:
> Tru,
>
> Thanks for the info.  Are there any other known rpms(From the Tao release)
> with this problem?

No, the perl package was the only one which had a wrong dependency issue
that I am aware of. ;) To stay on the safe side, my build host for CentOS-3
still have the 4.2.1-4.4 version installed.

To get the picture straight, I am not an official CentOS maintainer, I just
use/test it and build updates as I need them. The Tao linux x86_64 maintainer
may know more about it, I guess. The last time we talk about it he reported that
the beta U3 version has version 4.2.3-1 which fixed the problem.

Tru

ATOM RSS1 RSS2