SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael David Joy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael David Joy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:50:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
John,

The x86_64 built Scientific Linux kernel should at least be binary
compatible with the Xeon-64 processor. However, the chipset support for
this processor is most likely not supported. It may be a version or two
of the redhat enterprise kernel before Redhat and or Intel gets around
to incorporating the needed changes for PCI Express, and the like that
the new chipsets supporting this processor use.

If you look in the redhat source build spec's you will notice that they
have the option turned on to support this processor. I did not however
notice any additional code for the new chipsets last time I looked at
the build specs a month ago.

So yes and no, the processor may be supported but I think you may have
to wait awhile before you get a linux distro that runs on it because of
the chipset support.

You could always try bleeding edge Fedora Core 3 test 1 though. It's
possible that these changes have already started to make their way into
the 2.6.7 kernel.

I hope this helps,
Michael Joy
HEP - University of Mississippi
[log in to unmask]
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 11:10, Connie Sieh wrote:
> John,
>
> Do you mean EM64T support?
>
> -connie sieh
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, John Rowe wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know which distribution I need for this? Is the xeon-64
> > athlon-64 compatible or should I use the i386 distro?
> >
> > Interesting times..
> >
> > John
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2