Connie,

When you say that 302 is 301 with all the errata in the main tree, what
are the implications of this statement?

(1) Does it mean that 301 will no longer be maintained and that we need
to switch over to 302 asap?

(2) or, can you point yum on a 301 system will all its errata installed at the
302 errata tree and continue as if you have a fresh 302 system?

I'm guessing that the SL yum headers, the files under SL/base on the iso
image have updated, so 302 is really just 301 with all its errata in place.
Or, no cigar?

Cheers! Ken



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:25:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: csieh <[log in to unmask]>
To: Ken Teh <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: newbie questions

Ken,

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Ken Teh wrote:

> I just downloaded and installed a 301 machine.  Questions...for now,
>

Note that 302 is now available .  (It is same as 301 but with all the
errata already in the main tree)

<deleted...>