On 03/01/2012 02:31 PM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
> Hi g!
> 
>  On 2012.03.01 at 10:34:41 +0000, g wrote next:
> 
>> during recent update, yumex returned error;
>>
>> "Error checking package signatures:
>>  Package jdk-1.6.0_31-fcs.i586.rpm is not signed"
>>
>> update completed via "yum --nogpgcheck update".
> 
> This package isn't part of SL system.
-=-

not true - guess again.


the jdk package was a dependency of one of the java packages shown by
yumex/yum.


repos enabled are;

  adobe-linux-i386
  elrepo
  epel
  sl-base
  sl-contrib
  sl-fastbugs
  sl-security


from yumex;

---> Package java-1.6.0-openjdk.i386 1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8 set to be updated
---> Package java-1.6.0-sun-compat.i586 0:1.6.0.31-3.sl5.jpp set to be updated
---> Package jdk.i586 2000:1.6.0_31-fcs set to be updated
---> Package libsmbclient.i386 0:3.0.33-3.38.el5_8 set to be updated
---> Package samba-client.i386 0:3.0.33-3.38.el5_8 set to be updated
---> Package samba-common.i386 0:3.0.33-3.38.el5_8 set to be updated


from yum;

Updating:
 java-1.6.0-openjdk     i386  1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8    sl-security   37 M
 java-1.6.0-sun-compat  i586  1.6.0.31-3.sl5.jpp             sl-security   66 k
 jdk                    i586  2000:1.6.0_31-fcs              sl-security   68 M
 libsmbclient           i386  3.0.33-3.38.el5_8              sl-security  909 k
 samba-client           i386  3.0.33-3.38.el5_8              sl-security  5.7 M
 samba-common           i386  3.0.33-3.38.el5_8              sl-security  6.7 M


you will note, in above, that "jdk" is shown *sl-security*.


Running Transaction
  Updating       : jdk                                                     1/12
Unpacking JAR files...
        rt.jar...
        jsse.jar...
        charsets.jar...
        tools.jar...
        localedata.jar...
        plugin.jar...
        javaws.jar...
        deploy.jar...
  Updating       : java-1.6.0-sun-compat                                   2/12
  Updating       : java-1.6.0-openjdk                                      3/12
  Updating       : libsmbclient                                            4/12
  Updating       : samba-common                                            5/12
  Updating       : samba-client                                            6/12


<>

> Unless you have some specific requirements, generally you can use
> SL-supplied java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel packages
> instead of package above, then you won't have this kind of problem. But
> if you are sure you strictly require Oracle Java implementation, then,
> well, either deal with it, or try checking oracle website to see if you
> are using recommended way of installing it.
-=-

seems like you are guessing again.


> (note that using nogpgcheck all the time or setting it in yum.conf is
> a really bad and dangerous practice)
-=-

very much aware and only had to use this time.

-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****