SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Pilkington <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Pilkington <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:44:51 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
On 09/12/13 23:14, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> On 9 December 2013 22:48, John Pilkington <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 2013:024f PCTV Systems nanoStick T2 290e
>>
>
> Performing the usual "double grep" technique, I see that the em28xx
> driver is correct for your USB tuner.
>
> [Duo2 ~]$ rpm -qa kernel\* | sort
> kernel-2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.el6.noarch
> kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64
> kernel-lt-3.10.22-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
> kernel-lt-3.10.23-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
> kernel-ml-3.12.4-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
> [Duo2 ~]$
>
> [Duo2 ~]$ grep -i 2013 /lib/modules/*/modules.alias | grep -i 024f
> /lib/modules/3.10.22-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64/modules.alias:alias
> usb:v2013p024Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* em28xx
> /lib/modules/3.10.23-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64/modules.alias:alias
> usb:v2013p024Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* em28xx
> /lib/modules/3.12.4-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64/modules.alias:alias
> usb:v2013p024Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in* em28xx
> [Duo2 ~]$
>
> I can see no reason why it does not work.
>
> Please re-try with the current kernel-lt-3.10.23-1.el6.elrepo
> (released earlier today) and if still unsuccessful, take it to the
> appropriate ELRepo Project support channel where it can then be
> investigated further.
>
> Alan.

Yum isn't seeing it yet.  I'll try tomorrow.  I've been using the tuner 
with elrepo kernels since mid-May 2013.
>
> P.s. With regards to the ELRepo Project's bug tracker, I see that
> "JPilk" created an account at "2013-12-09 13:18" and then last logged
> in at "2013-12-09 14:37". I have performed a password reset on that
> account.

I filled in the form but it was rejected, with a hint that I might have 
sent it twice.  Going 'back' revealed no hints about what else might 
have gone wrong, and I gave up.  Maybe the fact that I had two machines 
in action caused problems.   Thanks for your interest.

John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2