SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:49:27 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
> More fresh m4 may be helpful:
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5x/SRPMS/SL/m4-1.4.8-1.src.rpm 

Why, thank you! But say, isn't this *highly* abnormal to have an older binary (m4-1.4.5-3.el5.1.i386.rpm) and a newer source (m4-1.4.8-1.src.rpm)?! 

I understand that you can't provide a newer package unless TUV does exactly the same, but hey... SOURCE? Is this SL or is it FreeBSD?

I'll try it though, it's my home PC anyway.

R-C





      Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2