SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL 6 vs. other RHEL clones: security advisory comparison
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:30:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 04:59 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> > b) delays in issuing bug fixes are good for you - no delay means they
> >    did not test the stuff before pushing it out.
> 
> FUD
> 

F = fear
U = uncertainty
D = deception

what did I say that qualifies? There is no "S" there for "stupid" or "O" for "obvious".


-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2