SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:09:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Jeffrey Anderson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> The message I get from the official voices in this thread is that there is
>> no supported method of upgrading major versions, only minor point versions.
>> It's no big deal. I just did a fresh install, then some cfengine magic and
>> am back up and running in a couple hours. I was just surprised because
>> major version upgrades have been available for every version of SL and TUV
>> for the past 15+ years, and when the install media did not give me that
>> option here I wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking something.
>
> I'm glad for you, and startled myself. Our favorite upstream vendor
> certainly supported doing updates from major OS versions to major OS
> versoins: you just couldn''t gracefully do it *live", because changing
> things like major versions of glibc and rpm while you're in the midst
> of using them to do the update is...... intriguingly problematic.
> (Tried it once: don't recommend it!)

Fedup solves the live problem by performing the upgrade from a custom initramfs.

(I've been upgrading to rawhide for a few years by upgrading
rpm/yum/python then kernel/glibc then init/udev then everything else
but I haven't checked the Fedora wiki for a LONG time to see whether
this is still the approved method. They seem to be OTT because every
step seems to pull in more and more dependencies with every new Fedora
version!)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2