Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:54:30 +0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Miles O'Neal wrote:
> Jon Peatfield said...
>
> |If you just want to add extra packages for the install then you can do
> |that just creating an extra 'yum repo' and pointing the sl5 installer at
> |it in addition to the standard ones.
> |
> |Then either with kickstart or a semi-manual install you get to see the
> |extra rpms in all the repos you have listed - and you can specify your own
> |groupings if you care to write a suitable comps xml file...
> |
> |Any other customisations can be done by a script (for kickstart) or extra
> |packages containing the magic (if you want to support manual installs).
> |
> |I guess if you want to make custom ISOs you need to arrange to either add
> |the extra repo into existing ones, ship an extra ISO of your repo or just
> |point them at a network accessible version.
> |
> |Keeping your own repo(s) of extra packages is handy for doing yum updates
> |from later anyway so you probably need that anyway.
> |
> |What else do 'sites' offer?
>
> That's fine until you start using a different version of
> a package than the vendor uses. Maybe there's a way around
> that in yum; I haven't really figured yum out yet. Is there
> a *good* doc on yum out there that explains such things?
>
Where are the equivalent documents for SL{3,4}? I'm not sure I
understand the question, and "site" is awfully vague.
_I_ don't like adding different versions of packages than the vendor
provides as it instantly increases the maintenance burden; RH does a
fairly good job of maintaining the packages it offers, and the cloners
such as SL mostly do a good job of tracking that maintenance and of
maintaining their own additions.
As soon as one uses a different version of a package, to a greater or
lesser extent that support is negated.
Generally, and depending on budgetary and support requirements, I would
choose amongst RHEL, a RHEL clone and Fedora, or the equivalent other
distros.
Where I require a wide range of prepackaged software, I tend to use
Debian (but it's a long time since that happened on my desktop, and with
the advent of support for virtualisation that has become less likely).
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
|
|
|