Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:43:31 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry, typo.
http://www.ksplice.com/
Ken Teh wrote:
> I was at a linux conference and met someone who sells a tool to patch
> linux kernels live without rebooting.
>
> http://www.kspice.com
>
>
>
> Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> What do other groups do about updating applications and machines
>> with long running processes ?
>>
>> My users run two sorts of long running processes, with different
>> problems when it comes to updates.
>>
>> First, I have users who never log off. Thus applications like
>> firefox and pdf viewers will be running when they are updated.
>> Some time later these applications may try to load and run plugins
>> which have been removed/updated.
>>
>> Second, I have users with long running calculations (often weeks
>> or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into
>> an updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual
>> calculation time lost is not significant, but calculations in
>> commercial packages such as Mathematica and Maple are often less good
>> about check-pointing.
>>
>> How do people balance the disruption of killing user processes
>> against the need to update to the latest versions of software ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
|
|
|