SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:43:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Sorry, typo.

http://www.ksplice.com/


Ken Teh wrote:
> I was at a linux conference and met someone who sells a tool to patch 
> linux kernels live without rebooting.
> 
> http://www.kspice.com
> 
> 
> 
> Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> What do other groups do about updating applications and machines
>> with long running processes ?
>>
>> My users run two sorts of long running processes, with different
>> problems when it comes to updates.
>>
>> First, I have users who never log off. Thus applications like
>> firefox and pdf viewers will be running when they are updated.
>> Some time later these applications may try to load and run plugins
>> which have been removed/updated.
>>
>> Second, I have users with long running calculations (often weeks
>> or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into 
>> an updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual 
>> calculation time lost is not significant, but calculations in
>> commercial packages such as Mathematica and Maple are often less good 
>> about check-pointing.
>>
>> How do people balance the disruption of killing user processes
>> against the need to update to the latest versions of software ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2