On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:
> The jdk's are now signed by me. I have tested them on both SL4 and SL5 32
> bit and 64 bit, and they are installing correctly. It looks like the
> signature didn't break them this time. Please let me know if anyone has any
> problems with these signed jdk's.
jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.i586.rpm is fine,
but my system doesn't like jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
# rm jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm*
# wget --no-cache http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
--05:51:40--
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
Resolving ftp.scientificlinux.org... 131.225.110.41
Connecting to ftp.scientificlinux.org|131.225.110.41|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 59807994 (57M) [application/x-rpm]
Saving to: `jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm'
100%[=============================================================================================>]
59,807,994 13.5M/s in 7.8s
05:51:52 (7.31 MB/s) - `jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm' saved [59807994/59807994]
# md5sum jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
038e61347d86ee0398551fdf1b276ce8 jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
# sha1sum jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
b3ea83bfd3a52dd7b6ab76614dfdf7b98c04f237 jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
# rpm -K jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm: (SHA1) DSA md5 gpg NOT OK
# rpmquery rpm
rpm-4.4.2-48.el5.x86_64
# host ftp.scientificlinux.org
ftp.scientificlinux.org is an alias for linux21.fnal.gov.linux21.fnal.gov has address 131.225.110.41
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna
