SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:34:39 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Over on
>        http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/?promoid=JZEFT
> it states:
>
>      NOTE: Adobe Flash Player 11.2 will be the last
>            version to target Linux as a supported platform.
>            Adobe will continue to provide security backports
>            to Flash Player 11.2 for Linux.
>
> Is not Flash a bit of a security nightmare to start with?
> Or is better if we only get backports?

http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html

   For Flash Player releases after 11.2, the Flash Player browser plugin
   for Linux will only be available via the "Pepper" API as part of the
   Google Chrome browser distribution and will no longer be available
   as a direct download from Adobe. Adobe will continue to provide
   security updates to non-Pepper distributions of Flash Player 11.2
   on Linux for five years from its release.

Basically, Firefox and Chrome have different plugin interfaces
and Adobe have decided to stop developing flash for the Firefox interface 
(on Linux).

As I remember, the Flash security releases for Firefox/Linux
have been more prompt since this policy change than before.
We aren't getting the new features, so there is less to test
and we aren't getting new security holes.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2