On 20 August 2012 17:22, Ian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> you are over simplifying the process. Eg. What was the time lag from
>> when the srpm was released and the rhn notes published to when CentOS
>> released that specific update ?
>>
> I seriously think this is the wrong place to discuss CentOS specifically,
> don't you?

1) To quote you: Firstly, I don't really like being told where I can
and can't post. If the discussion is off-topic, then so is the topic
IMHO.

2) You brought it up and got called on it.

3) You still haven't proved your point.. you just tried to jog around
the gaping hole in your logic.. eg you did not have any cases that
other clones have a release time <= SrpmReleaseTime.

Now to go back to your original email, you pulled in that you were not
a scientist but this list is filled with them and if you want to
advocate your point better.. you need to have data that can be shared
and checked.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it."
Linus Torvalds
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me."  —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd