SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:38:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:40:38PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:15:24PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> If you're using NetworkManager for *anything* on a server, don't.
> >>
> >
> >
> > This was and still is good advice for SL5 based systems.
> >
> > On SL6, (after some initial doubts,) I find the NetworkManager to be quite
> > good at handling statically configured interfaces (see note 1).
> 
> Well I don't.  I find that NetworkManager prevents me from setting up
> ethernet bridges entirely on SL6 unless I simply turn it off.
>


I agree. I think NM was designed for handling Wifi on laptops, but just happens
to work mostly okey for plain wired interfaces. Bridges, bonding, vlans,
aliases (multiple IP on the same physical eth) are right out. Such a huge
amount of work for such big infractructure for so limited function.


-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2