Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:13:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:45 AM, [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Le 19/11/2014 14:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:54 AM, John Lauro <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I suggest you use wget --continue. If for some reason it fails in
>>> one-shot, then when you run it again, it will continue from where it left
>>> off. That should work with most http servers. For me, I find direct
>>> download is typically faster than torrents, assuming the server has a good
>>> connection and rtt latency is lower than most torrent peers.
>>
>> rsync -P can be better, because of the better checksum verification..
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Using rsync would require a rsync daemon on the other side ?
Or SSH based rsync, but there are *plenty* of such repositorie, listed
at https://www.scientificlinux.org/downloads/sl-mirrors/.
|
|
|