SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dan M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:24:33 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
In my experience trying to get vmware to load and run under SL6 has been nothing short of  a root canal.  All I needed was to load a OpenSolaris/Indiana quickly from a live medium, no install no mess. I shied away from VirtualBox due to the Oracle nature of the beast and tried to load vmware first. That was doomed to fail apparently. Instead a navigation to the virtualbox page, a download of an rpm and bam done. 



Sorry this is kind off topic just an experience of one user. 



/Dan

 

:w! saves



-----Original Message-----

From: Alex Kruchkoff <[log in to unmask]>

Sender: [log in to unmask]

Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:00:54 

To: carlopmart<[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>

Subject: RE: Problems with VMWare tools



On my MacBook Pro I have VirtualBox running SL 5.4, win xp and FreeBSD.

I also had another guest  OS -- OpenSolaris but Oracle killed that project :-(

On RHEL 5 I run VirtualBox with win XP and I am very happy with VirtualBox.



Cheers

Alex 

________________________________________

From: [log in to unmask] [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of carlopmart [[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2011 05:21

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Problems with VMWare tools



On 04/29/2011 08:50 PM, Chris Tooley wrote:

> Just thought I would voice my support for VirtualBox over vmware. Feel

> free to ignore this email if you're set on VMware :)

>

> However, I've found virtualbox to be just as good if not better, and

> it's completely free. Although, Virtualbox is currently owned by oracle

> now, but hopefully it remains free. There is USB passthrough as well as

> 3D rendering if your host machine supports it - and I don't get annoyed

> with it as much as I do vmware.

>

> -Chris

>



I respect your opinion about virtualbox Chris, but virtualbox best than

vmware?? Absolutely not. It's free, yes but is worst in most aspects

than vmware.



For example, under vmware you can run ANY operating system that runs on

i386 platforms with more performance than virtualbox (included

unsupported operated systems), with virtualbox not.



And about using USB passthrought and 3D support. I don't know which type

of problems do you have got with vmware, but I have a Windows 7

installed with this feautures and it is fast and simple to configure

under vmware.



Best regards.



--

CL Martinez

carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com


ATOM RSS1 RSS2