SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dag Wieers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dag Wieers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:37:58 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Tom H wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Dag Wieers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> It's pretty cynical to learn that at Google the RHEL packages have been
>> build in an Ubuntu environment, rather than properly packaged on the same
>> distribution. A practice that almost everyone is doing today.
>>
>> It's amazing that this even worked, we'd be better off if it didn't...
>
> They must be using mock, which is available in Ubuntu.

They cannot be using mock, otherwise it wouldn't pick up the newer, alien 
libstdc++ from Ubuntu 12.04. Besides, if they did it would all have 
magically worked (or not have built at all).

     Version     : 27.0.1453.110
     Build Host: lin64build12.chrome.corp.google.com

vs

     Version     : 28.0.1500.70
     Build Host: precise64build2.chrome.corp.google.com
     RPM version: 4.9.1.1

So the RPM version pretty much gives away that they do not build on RHEL. 
And rpm-4.9.1.1 is exactly what ships with Ubuntu Precise Pangolin (aka 
Ubuntu 12.04).

Need more proof ? :-)

-- 
-- dag wieers, [log in to unmask], http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, [log in to unmask], http://dagit.net/

[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2