SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Mosgalin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vladimir Mosgalin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:17:55 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia!

 On 2012.03.30 at 22:34:37 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote next:

> 
> > I haven't, but just wanted to say that both VirtualBox and VMWare Player
> > run fine under SL6.0, and provide a much better user experience than KVM.
> > I've run XP and and W7 with no issues using VBox and VMWare.
> >
> KVM has allegedly gotten better, and with the direct support of our
> favorite upstream vendor it may be a workable enterprise solution. But I
> still find that the built-in management tools for it were designed by
> monkeys actually trying to write Hamlet.

I didn't try W8 preview, but earlier W8 beta installed and worked just
fine under KVM in SL6.1, without any problems. I picked Windows 7 in
virt-manager during installation.

-- 

Vladimir

ATOM RSS1 RSS2