SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Docker
From:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Feb 2015 07:39:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:59 AM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2015, Tom H <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Of course errors can happen. I'd expect RH to fix them quickly because
>> it's in its interest for RHEL rebuilders to publish a distro as
>> similar to RHEL as possible.
>
> How so? Red Hat wants people to buy the support exact duplicate distros give people an excuse not to buy the support. So how is that in Red Hats best interest?

More potential future RHEL users and admins and fewer users and admins
of other distros. Especially sysadmins...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2