SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:06:01 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (32 lines)
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hello,
> Before pushing this out, I was hoping that somebody could test the new R 
> package for SL5.  I think it's ok, but it's a new version and since I don't 
> use it, I'm not positive it's correct.  This is R version 2.5.0
>
> To Test
> -------
> If you already have R installed
>
>  yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update
>
> If you don't have it installed
>
>  yum --enablerepo=sl-testing install R R-devel

After doing:

   yum --enablerepo=sl-testing check-update

I thought I was being clever by running:

   yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update R R-devel

but that ONLY upgraded R, not libRmath :-(

Anyway I now have it on a test box and will ask a couple of people who 
know R to give it a good beating.

  -- Jon

ATOM RSS1 RSS2