On 12/17/2014 04:25 PM, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo wrote:
> I mean, if SL will become a CentOS variant or not.
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On 17 December 2014 at 14:49, Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
>     <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>         Hi guys...
>
>         What about CentOS variant for SL?... Still planning, or this
>         kind of "merging" will not apply?
>
>
>     I think it is going to take a lot more context for anyone to
>     understand what you are meaning.
>
>
>         --
>         Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
>         *Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información
>         Linux user #487547
>
>
>
>     --
>     Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
> *Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información
> Linux user #487547

I think the answer to that is no.  The SL team made a decision to 
continue to spin their own independent set of packages and not become an 
add-on repository to the CentOS build.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong...

-Mark