SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL7x and the 'epel' repo
From:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:48:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Steve Gaarder
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Steve Gaarder wrote:
>>
>> I see this also with libgtop2. I currently cannot install the Mate
>> group because the packages in EPEL require libgtop-2.0.so.10, which is
>> in the package libgtop2-2.28.4-7.el7.x86_64.rpm, which in turn is only
>> in SL7rolling. This suggests that EPEL is built against 7rolling,
>> which seems like a really bad idea.
>
> Thinking about this some more, I assume that EPEL is actually built against
> the latest from TUV, so 7.1 in this case. Correct? If that is true, then I
> just need to be patient and wait for SL to release 7.1. Then the question
> is: how patient do I need to be?

Until SL 7.1 is released?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2