SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:02:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
On 03/30/2015 08:53 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 30/03/15 14:10, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> On 03/27/2015 02:03 PM, Steve Gaarder wrote:
>>> My main concern would be how to go back to 7x after the release.
>>
>> For this one, I will refer you to this section of our 7 release notes:
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7x/x86_64/release-notes/#_using_sl_yum_variables 
>>
>>
>>
>> That section didn't gather a lot of feedback during the 7.0 pre-release
>> phase, so if it is unclear let me know and I'll see about making some
>> adjustments.
>>
>> Pat
>>
> Thank you, Pat.
>
> Yes, it's all there and labelled 'Important'.  I just hadn't realised, 
> when it all started, that I was "wishing to test packages from the 
> Release Candidate during the Release Candidate process".   I didn't 
> have my eye on TUV's releases at all;  I hoped I was providing the 
> feedback implicitly invited by the 'testing' label.
>
> John

Happy to help John,

As always we value all the feedback we get during our testing phases!

Hope everyone reading this has a nice day!

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2